Self-Correcting

I feel there are many elements about AI that will eventually be self-correcting… in a sort of apocalyptic, crash-and-burn kind of way. For example, the AI-summarized web doesn’t leave much economic oxygen for people to create content worth summarizing. Assuming, of course, that ad-based revenue streams continue to make sense at all as we cross into over 50% of all internet traffic being bots.

On an individual level, I am experiencing some interesting changes that may also be self-correcting.

I have mentioned it a few times, but I have had a problem with watching Youtube (Shorts). As in, I would pop on over to quickly decompress from some other activity, and then 2-3 hours later, awaken from my fugue, algorithmic state having not accomplished anything that I had set out to. It’s a problem.

…or, at least, it was. Because I am now beginning to encounter (presumed) AI-directed, curated, and/or created content. And it repulses me in an uncanny valley way. Takes me right out of whatever hypnosis I was under and immediately causes me to close the tab. Which, of course, is great for me.

I put “presumed” up there though, because sometimes I cannot really tell. For example, this video about “15 forgotten garden traditions” is probably AI generated – it features generic voiceover on top of stitched-together montage of others peoples’ (at least attributed) content. Much like the now-maligned em dash however, perhaps that style of video is now just guilty by association? Another video was on The Saver’s Paradox and my AI-dar went off immediately. Looking further into the channel and thinking about what it would require to prompt that level of video though, it seems like it’s legit.

Perhaps neither of those videos bothered you in the slightest. In which case, congratulations! You are absolutely set up for a future filled to the brim with… content. For me though, the magic is gone.

It may well be inevitable that the quality of AI generation is such that it become indistinguishable from human content. In which case, why would I be on Youtube at all, instead of in my own prompt?

Self-correcting! As it turns out, even black holes evaporate eventually.

Posted on October 8, 2025, in Commentary and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. “It may well be inevitable that the quality of AI generation is such that it become indistinguishable from human content. In which case, why would I be on Youtube at all, instead of in my own prompt?”

    That’s both the dream and the nightmare, isn’t it? I read a piece by Cory Doctorow last week where he was ranting about the size of the bubble and how it was literally impossible for any of the companies pushing AI to ever recoup their investments, far less make a profit. The other side of that coin is that if the technology ever matches the promises made for it, it will be so perfectly capable of giving users exactly what they want, they’ll never need to consume any other content beyond what they can make for themselves.

    Either way, it’s not going to end well for a very large number of existing players in the market, is it?

    Like